[PATCH 3/3] xkbcomp: Add missing flag support and correct modifier handling of ISOLock
Andreas Wettstein
wettstein509 at solnet.ch
Thu Jan 23 11:40:00 PST 2014
Add missing support for "affect" flag to selectively affect locking or
unlocking for for modifier locking, control locking, and ISOLock.
Fix some incorrect masking and modifier handling for ISOLock.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Wettstein <wettstein509 at solnet.ch>
---
action.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/action.c b/action.c
index 4623c0c..7188d6b 100644
--- a/action.c
+++ b/action.c
@@ -436,33 +436,13 @@ HandleSetLatchMods(XkbDescPtr xkb,
return ReportIllegal(action->type, field);
}
-static Bool
-HandleLockMods(XkbDescPtr xkb,
- XkbAnyAction * action,
- unsigned field, ExprDef * array_ndx, ExprDef * value)
-{
- XkbModAction *act;
- unsigned t1, t2;
-
- act = (XkbModAction *) action;
- if ((array_ndx != NULL) && (field == F_Modifiers))
- return ReportActionNotArray(action->type, field);
- switch (field)
- {
- case F_Modifiers:
- t1 = act->flags;
- if (CheckModifierField(xkb, action->type, value, &t1, &t2))
- {
- act->flags = t1;
- act->real_mods = act->mask = (t2 & 0xff);
- t2 = (t2 >> 8) & 0xffff;
- XkbSetModActionVMods(act, t2);
- return True;
- }
- return False;
- }
- return ReportIllegal(action->type, field);
-}
+static LookupEntry lockWhich[] = {
+ {"both", 0},
+ {"lock", XkbSA_LockNoUnlock},
+ {"neither", (XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock)},
+ {"unlock", XkbSA_LockNoLock},
+ {NULL, 0}
+};
static LookupEntry groupNames[] = {
{"group1", 1},
@@ -514,6 +494,41 @@ CheckGroupField(unsigned action,
}
static Bool
+HandleLockMods(XkbDescPtr xkb,
+ XkbAnyAction * action,
+ unsigned field, ExprDef * array_ndx, ExprDef * value)
+{
+ XkbModAction *act;
+ unsigned t1, t2;
+ ExprResult rtrn;
+
+ act = (XkbModAction *) action;
+ if ((array_ndx != NULL) && (field == F_Modifiers || field == F_Affect))
+ return ReportActionNotArray(action->type, field);
+ switch (field)
+ {
+ case F_Affect:
+ if (!ExprResolveEnum(value, &rtrn, lockWhich))
+ return ReportMismatch(action->type, field, "lock or unlock");
+ act->flags &= ~(XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock);
+ act->flags |= rtrn.ival;
+ return True;
+ case F_Modifiers:
+ t1 = act->flags;
+ if (CheckModifierField(xkb, action->type, value, &t1, &t2))
+ {
+ act->flags = t1;
+ act->real_mods = act->mask = (t2 & 0xff);
+ t2 = (t2 >> 8) & 0xffff;
+ XkbSetModActionVMods(act, t2);
+ return True;
+ }
+ return False;
+ }
+ return ReportIllegal(action->type, field);
+}
+
+static Bool
HandleSetLatchGroup(XkbDescPtr xkb,
XkbAnyAction * action,
unsigned field, ExprDef * array_ndx, ExprDef * value)
@@ -641,14 +656,6 @@ static LookupEntry btnNames[] = {
{NULL, 0}
};
-static LookupEntry lockWhich[] = {
- {"both", 0},
- {"lock", XkbSA_LockNoUnlock},
- {"neither", (XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock)},
- {"unlock", XkbSA_LockNoLock},
- {NULL, 0}
-};
-
static Bool
HandlePtrBtn(XkbDescPtr xkb,
XkbAnyAction * action,
@@ -779,8 +786,12 @@ static LookupEntry isoNames[] = {
{"pointer", XkbSA_ISONoAffectPtr},
{"ctrls", XkbSA_ISONoAffectCtrls},
{"controls", XkbSA_ISONoAffectCtrls},
- {"all", ~((unsigned) 0)},
+ {"all", XkbSA_ISOAffectMask},
{"none", 0},
+ {"both", 0},
+ {"lock", XkbSA_LockNoUnlock},
+ {"neither", (XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock)},
+ {"unlock", XkbSA_LockNoLock},
{NULL, 0},
};
@@ -804,8 +815,8 @@ HandleISOLock(XkbDescPtr xkb,
if (CheckModifierField(xkb, action->type, value, &flags, &mods))
{
act->flags = flags & (~XkbSA_ISODfltIsGroup);
- act->real_mods = mods & 0xff;
- mods = (mods >> 8) & 0xff;
+ act->real_mods = act->mask = (mods & 0xff);
+ mods = (mods >> 8) & 0xffff;
XkbSetModActionVMods(act, mods);
return True;
}
@@ -826,7 +837,9 @@ HandleISOLock(XkbDescPtr xkb,
return ReportActionNotArray(action->type, field);
if (!ExprResolveMask(value, &rtrn, SimpleLookup, (XPointer) isoNames))
return ReportMismatch(action->type, field, "keyboard component");
- act->affect = (~rtrn.uval) & XkbSA_ISOAffectMask;
+ act->affect = (~rtrn.uval) & XkbSA_ISOAffectMask;
+ act->flags &= ~(XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock);
+ act->flags |= rtrn.ival & (XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock);
return True;
}
return ReportIllegal(action->type, field);
@@ -943,6 +956,15 @@ HandleSetLockControls(XkbDescPtr xkb,
XkbActionSetCtrls(act, rtrn.uval);
return True;
}
+ else if (field == F_Affect && action->type == XkbSA_LockControls) {
+ if (array_ndx != NULL)
+ return ReportActionNotArray(action->type, field);
+ if (!ExprResolveEnum(value, &rtrn, lockWhich))
+ return ReportMismatch(action->type, field, "lock or unlock");
+ act->flags &= ~(XkbSA_LockNoLock | XkbSA_LockNoUnlock);
+ act->flags |= rtrn.ival;
+ return True;
+ }
return ReportIllegal(action->type, field);
}
@@ -1289,7 +1311,7 @@ ApplyActionFactoryDefaults(XkbAction * action)
}
else if (action->type == XkbSA_ISOLock)
{
- action->iso.real_mods = LockMask;
+ action->iso.real_mods = action->iso.mask = LockMask;
}
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list