[PATCH 10/15] glamor: Disable the XV code for now.

[Michel Dänzer]

On Don, 2014-01-16 at 08:51 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> writes:
> 
> > On Fre, 2014-01-10 at 09:26 +0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> We're going to want to make this DIX code instead of XF86 if at all
> >> possible, but for now just disable it so we can work on the rest of
> >> the build.
> >
> > The radeon driver can't really use the in-tree glamor unless it supports
> > Xv. What's your plan for phasing out the standalone glamor in favour of
> > the in-tree one?
> 
> There's a later set of patches for building the xf86 module and turning
> on the current XV code.  (I still want to rewrite the XV to be dix,
> which I think involves pulling down the current two identical DDX
> implementations to mi so that I don't have to write yet annother one).
> 
> If in-tree glamor isn't better than external glamor by 1.16, the
> something has gone horribly wrong.

Sounds great, thanks for the clarification.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast          |                Mesa and X developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20140117/4f121f37/attachment.pgp>