[PATCH 2/4] modesetting: Use a gbm buffer for shadow if we can

Keith Packard keithp at keithp.com
Thu Dec 25 13:46:31 PST 2014


Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand at intel.com>

We probably only want to use a gbm buffer if we're using glamor;
otherwise, it's possible we'll get potentially slow video memory for our
software rendering path, and that would defeat most of the reason for
using a shadow frame buffer.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20141225/873d3d62/attachment.sig>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list