tile property contents
Aaron Plattner
aplattner at nvidia.com
Tue Dec 2 16:01:00 PST 2014
On 10/13/2014 08:23 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been hacking on mutter and the gnome pieces for tiling, and
> I've at least fixed mutter locally so maximise windows works and the
> heads are in the right order.
>
> Now I've strung all the pieces together using a single KMS property
> that X.org propogates, and mutter picks up and propagates over dbus as
> well,
>
> Currently I've ascii encoded the property into a blob,
>
> <ver>:<tileid>:<flags>:<maxhtiles>:<maxvtiles>:<h_tile_loc>:<v_tile_loc>:<tile_w>:<tile_h>
>
> I'm thinking of dropping the version field and just exposing TILE2
> property if we need it later to add more values,
Nifty. Is there a randrproto.txt spec for this planned?
> The other fields:
> tileid: a group id assigned by the kernel to all tiles in the same
What format does this ID need to be in? It looks like monitors are
identified by (vendor id, product id, serial number) tuples in the
DisplayID extension block so it would make sense to just concatenate
that into one giant number as the tileid. Having to centrally manage
these (in the kernel??) seems like overkill.
> group - unique per group
> flags: bit 0 : single monitor enclosure
> maxhtiles: total number of horiz tiles
> maxvtiles: total number of vert tiles
> h_tile_loc: horiz location of this output in tile group
> v_tile_loc: vert location of this output in tile group
> tile_w: width of this tile
> tile_h: height of this tile.
>
> Now we extract all of these from the DisplayID v1.3 block, and I'm
> wondering if maybe I shouldn't just export the whole DisplayID tiling
> info block instead, it however encodes a few other pieces of
> information, including bezel info, and some flags specifying behaviour
> in some cases.
I don't know whether the other flags would be useful, but one important
one is the "native resolution" field. At least one monitor I've seen
fails to work if you drive the normal EDID "preferred" timings on both
tiles.
> The former could be more suitable for cases where DisplayID isn't
> available (Dual DSI panels?) but I'm worried abuot exposing too little
> at this point making TILE useless when the next monitor comes out.
>
> I'm not sure any part of the stack should be extracting things and
> splitting them out, I'd like to just give the same tile property all
> the way through.
>
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
--
Aaron
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list