[PATCH 2/2] damageext: Xineramify (v4)

[Keith Packard]

Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> writes:

> Phrased another way: miext/damage/ doesn't change here, and that's what
> we use internally.  But damageext/ does, because that's the protocol,
> and Xinerama needs to mangle the protocol.

Thanks for the explanation. So, the Xinerama damageext code just
needs magic for the DamageSubtract request to take the union'd damage
that it tracks and clip it to the union'd window regions.

Sounds good.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20131010/d812724f/attachment.pgp>