[PATCH 0/7] libxshmfence improvements

[Keith Packard]

Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> writes:

> Hm.  This would presumably fall over if running a Linux binary against a
> *BSD Xorg and kernel (or vice-versa if someone implemented BSD binary
> compat for Linux).  But _probably_ whoever finds themself in that
> particular nightmare scenario would be facing quite a few other
> problems.

If BSD provided a futex syscall to all apps, then this would all
presumably 'just work'. Given that they don't, there's no way it would
work anyways...

> Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>

Thanks. I rebased on top of the other config changes and pushed to
master.
   d6fe39b..d4938bf  master -> master

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20131120/6aec22cb/attachment.pgp>