[PATCH] ARM64: Add support for aarch64
Egbert Eich
eich at freedesktop.org
Thu Aug 15 03:03:42 PDT 2013
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse.de>
---
hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h | 2 +-
hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c | 3 ++-
include/servermd.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h b/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
index c980bee..3a57186 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
+++ b/hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ stl_u(unsigned long val, unsigned int *p)
#else /* ix86 */
#if !defined(__SUNPRO_C)
-#if !defined(FAKEIT) && !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__arm__) && !defined(__sh__) && !defined(__hppa__) && !defined(__s390__) && !defined(__m32r__)
+#if !defined(FAKEIT) && !defined(__mc68000__) && !defined(__arm__) && !defined(__sh__) && !defined(__hppa__) && !defined(__s390__) && !defined(__m32r__) && !defined(__aarch64__)
#ifdef GCCUSESGAS
/*
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c b/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c
index d9a5da1..43d0a36 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static Bool ExtendedEnabled = FALSE;
!defined(__sparc__) && \
!defined(__mips__) && \
!defined(__nds32__) && \
- !defined(__arm__)
+ !defined(__arm__) && \
+ !defined(__aarch64__)
/*
* Due to conflicts with "compiler.h", don't rely on <sys/io.h> to declare
diff --git a/include/servermd.h b/include/servermd.h
index d6a9a3a..11f6c10 100644
--- a/include/servermd.h
+++ b/include/servermd.h
@@ -286,6 +286,20 @@ SOFTWARE.
#define GLYPHPADBYTES 4
#endif /* linux/s390 */
+#ifdef __aarch64__
+
+#ifdef __AARCH64EL__
+#define IMAGE_BYTE_ORDER LSBFirst
+#define BITMAP_BIT_ORDER LSBFirst
+#endif
+#ifdef __AARCH64EB__
+#define IMAGE_BYTE_ORDER MSBFirst
+#define BITMAP_BIT_ORDER MSBFirst
+#endif
+#define GLYPHPADBYTES 4
+
+#endif /* __aarch64__ */
+
/* size of buffer to use with GetImage, measured in bytes. There's obviously
* a trade-off between the amount of heap used and the number of times the
* ddx routine has to be called.
--
1.8.1.4
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list