[PATCH 11/12] dri2: Don't block GLX clients on VT switch

Eric Anholt eric at anholt.net
Tue Oct 16 18:18:04 PDT 2012


Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> writes:

> This was necessary in DRI1 for a variety of reasons (SAREA ownership,
> VRAM layout, etc).  None of that is relevant to DRI2.  Which is good,
> because VT switch is an xf86-ism and I'd like to make DRI2
> ddx-independent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>

We still do this?  Not cool.

The only risk I see is if it means that new clients race ahead to trying
to do dri2 auth and fail because we've dropped master.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20121016/ed5f235b/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list