[PULL] unreviewed patches

[Keith Packard]

Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> writes:

> For XChangeDeviceControl, we actually have it documented that BadMatch is a
> valid error code (and from my reading it appears to be the best choice
> here).

Ok, I'm easy on error codes; apps don't actually check anyways. Just
wondering if you'd thought about it, or if the values were completely
random...

> The code is more complicated largely to avoid duplicate raw events.

Yeah, that's why I suggested the cleanup above; keeping track that
you've sent an event instead of essentially recomputing it seems like a
simpler way to know when to send another event.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20121101/7d776c37/attachment.pgp>