[PATCH] cvt: add -i/--interlaced to documentation

Alon Levy alevy at redhat.com
Wed May 23 23:39:31 PDT 2012


On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:37:48PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 05/20/12 04:54 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com>
> 
> cvt.c currently says:
> 
> /*
>  * I'm not documenting --interlaced for obvious reasons, even though I did
>  * implement it. I also can't deny having looked at gtf here.
>  */
> 
> Are those reasons no longer valid?  (Sadly they're not obvious to me.)

Missed that, sorry for the noise. I don't know either. Please ignore the
patch.

> 
> At the very least a patch to document --interlaced should remove the comment
> claiming it's intentionally undocumented, preferably explain why the change
> in intentions has been made.
> 
> -- 
> 	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
> 	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list