[PATCH] cvt: add -i/--interlaced to documentation
Alon Levy
alevy at redhat.com
Wed May 23 23:39:31 PDT 2012
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:37:48PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 05/20/12 04:54 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <alevy at redhat.com>
>
> cvt.c currently says:
>
> /*
> * I'm not documenting --interlaced for obvious reasons, even though I did
> * implement it. I also can't deny having looked at gtf here.
> */
>
> Are those reasons no longer valid? (Sadly they're not obvious to me.)
Missed that, sorry for the noise. I don't know either. Please ignore the
patch.
>
> At the very least a patch to document --interlaced should remove the comment
> claiming it's intentionally undocumented, preferably explain why the change
> in intentions has been made.
>
> --
> -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
> Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list