Keith? Re: [PATCH] Actually send the reply in SProcDRI2Connect()

[Alan Coopersmith]

On 05/22/12 11:37 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2012-05-22 at 08:34 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: 
>> On 05/22/12 02:07 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 21:51 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: 
>>>> No point faking up a reply for remote clients if we never send it to them.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>
>>>
>>> Duplicate of http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-May/030843.html
>>
>> Oh, cool, it's not just me.
>>
>> Has a pull request been sent for that or was it submitted as a single patch
>> waiting for Keith to apply directly?
> 
> I haven't seen a pull request, so I assume the latter.

Looking at the headers captured in http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/10174/
it does seem to be addressed to Keith to apply:

From: Michal Srb <msrb at suse.com>
To: Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dri2: SProcDRI2Connect - send the response.
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 18:29:56 +0200
Message-ID: <2391089.ABGY0Qo0ou at dhcp71>
Cc: xorg-devel at lists.x.org

Keith - are you behind on individual patches vs. pulls or is there something
else wrong with this one?

-- 
	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc