lack of reviewers

[Daniel Stone]

Hi,

On 18 May 2012 20:05, Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Of course it interferes with the existing process.
>>
>> If it was not used it would be of no use.
>
> You don't have to make it required, if the system is successful people
> will migrate out of free will.

I'm not sure I have too much to add to this discussion, since I'm yet
another person who's entirely qualified to do reviews but just isn't.

As for the tool issues, however - patchwork exists and does that, and
does indeed have a git hook that's supposed to clean up patches which
have been committed.  Whether or not this works or happens is
irrelevant, the fact is that it could be made to do so if it doesn't
already with much less typing than has been expended on this thread
already.

Cheers,
Daniel