[PATCH] Cache xkbcomp output

[Keith Packard]

Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> writes:

> Not that I actually have the time to work on this, but I'd been
> thinking about xkbcommon lately. Do you think it's possible to build a
> compatibility layer around the current code?

I don't know, but I'd be surprised if xkbcommon provided enough
low-level information to support the existing XKB protocol. I hope
Daniel can answer this question...

> What do you think? It seems silly not to be making use of xkbcommon in
> X.

That was the plan, but then the plan also included replacing XKB with
XKB2, which was supposed to have vastly simplified XKB...

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20120713/da269386/attachment.pgp>