[PATCH 2/2] Fix axis labelling for mixed devices.
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Tue Jan 17 14:11:15 PST 2012
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:34:38PM +0100, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 01/17/2012 06:05 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > If a device has both relative and absolute axes, we'd initialise the
> > relative axes but label them with the absolute labels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> > ---
> > src/evdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c
> > index effac40..1cdba41 100644
> > --- a/src/evdev.c
> > +++ b/src/evdev.c
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static BOOL EvdevGrabDevice(InputInfoPtr pInfo, int grab, int ungrab);
> > static void EvdevSetCalibration(InputInfoPtr pInfo, int num_calibration, int calibration[4]);
> > static int EvdevOpenDevice(InputInfoPtr pInfo);
> >
> > -static void EvdevInitAxesLabels(EvdevPtr pEvdev, int natoms, Atom *atoms);
> > +static void EvdevInitAxesLabels(EvdevPtr pEvdev, int mode, int natoms, Atom *atoms);
> > static void EvdevInitButtonLabels(EvdevPtr pEvdev, int natoms, Atom *atoms);
> > static void EvdevInitProperty(DeviceIntPtr dev);
> > static int EvdevSetProperty(DeviceIntPtr dev, Atom atom,
> > @@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ EvdevAddAbsValuatorClass(DeviceIntPtr device)
> > i++;
> > }
> >
> > - EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, pEvdev->num_vals + num_mt_axes, atoms);
> > + EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, Absolute, pEvdev->num_vals + num_mt_axes, atoms);
> >
> > if (!InitValuatorClassDeviceStruct(device, num_axes + num_mt_axes, atoms,
> > GetMotionHistorySize(), Absolute)) {
> > @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ EvdevAddRelValuatorClass(DeviceIntPtr device)
> > i++;
> > }
> >
> > - EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, pEvdev->num_vals, atoms);
> > + EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, Relative, pEvdev->num_vals, atoms);
> >
> > if (!InitValuatorClassDeviceStruct(device, num_axes, atoms,
> > GetMotionHistorySize(), Relative)) {
> > @@ -2637,18 +2637,18 @@ static char* btn_labels[][16] = {
> > }
> > };
> >
> > -static void EvdevInitAxesLabels(EvdevPtr pEvdev, int natoms, Atom *atoms)
> > +static void EvdevInitAxesLabels(EvdevPtr pEvdev, int mode, int natoms, Atom *atoms)
> > {
> > Atom atom;
> > int axis;
> > char **labels;
> > int labels_len = 0;
> >
> > - if (pEvdev->flags & EVDEV_ABSOLUTE_EVENTS)
> > + if (mode == Absolute)
> > {
> > labels = abs_labels;
> > labels_len = ArrayLength(abs_labels);
> > - } else if ((pEvdev->flags & EVDEV_RELATIVE_EVENTS))
> > + } else if (mode == Relative)
> > {
> > labels = rel_labels;
> > labels_len = ArrayLength(rel_labels);
> > @@ -2810,8 +2810,19 @@ EvdevInitProperty(DeviceIntPtr dev)
> > /* Axis labelling */
> > if ((pEvdev->num_vals > 0) && (prop_axis_label = XIGetKnownProperty(AXIS_LABEL_PROP)))
> > {
> > + int mode;
> > Atom atoms[pEvdev->num_vals];
> > - EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, pEvdev->num_vals, atoms);
> > +
> > + if (pEvdev->flags & EVDEV_ABSOLUTE_EVENTS)
> > + mode = Absolute;
> > + else if (pEvdev->flags & EVDEV_RELATIVE_EVENTS)
> > + mode = Relative;
> > + else {
> > + xf86IDrvMsg(pInfo, X_ERROR, "BUG: mode is neither absolute nor relative\n");
> > + mode = Absolute;
> > + }
> > +
> > + EvdevInitAxesLabels(pEvdev, mode, pEvdev->num_vals, atoms);
> > XIChangeDeviceProperty(dev, prop_axis_label, XA_ATOM, 32,
> > PropModeReplace, pEvdev->num_vals, atoms, FALSE);
> > XISetDevicePropertyDeletable(dev, prop_axis_label, FALSE);
>
> How does this fix mixed mode devices? We're still only initializing the
> array for either relative or absolute, but not both.
it doesn't yet, but tbh I don't think that's the only issue we have with
mixed mode devices. one day I'll get to it, but that day ain't today.
Cheers,
Peter
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list