[PATCH intel-gpu-tools 00/10] Upgrade module configuration and packaging (reposted to .cc)
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Jan 4 01:52:06 PST 2012
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:12:16PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> This module is hosted as an X.Org app and is published as such.
> This patch adds some missing packaging files and sets some basic infrastructure
> common to all xorg modules which saves maintenance in the long run.
>
> http://www.x.org/wiki/NewModuleGuidelines
>
> This series applies some xorg project policies and code reuse from util-macros.
> In some cases it reverts "upgrades" that were "too new" for the overall xorg.
> There were no bug fixes, things went smoothly.
>
> All the changes done are generic and have been applied/reviewed to all xorg modules.
> Should there be any reasons to deviate, I'd be happy to make appropriate adjustements
> and comments.
>
> Gaetan Nadon (10):
> Add mandatory COPYING file.
> Use standard .gitignore file and layout
> Man pages still showing version 1.0 in the 1.1 release
> Add mandatory ChangeLog and INSTALL files
> config: remove unrequired AM_PROG_CC_C_O
> config: remove duplicate AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG__CC_99
> config: use project wide xorg warnings variable
> config: set-up xorg automatic rebuilding rules
> config: the minimum version for autoconf is 2.60
> config: restore the libtool minimum version to 1.5
Applied and pushed, thanks for the patches.
While I have the attention of someone versed in buildsystem-fu:
intel-gpu-tools also contains a set of tests for the i915 kernel module
(and the libdrm interface for it). Currently we run them with
$ make test
by abusing the automake test rig. Is this ok or is there a better way to
do something like this?
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list