[PATCH 3/5] Check for proper window ID when processing touch allow requests
Chase Douglas
chase.douglas at canonical.com
Fri Feb 3 16:52:01 PST 2012
On 02/03/2012 09:54 AM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.02.2012 01:57, schrieb Chase Douglas:
>> From: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas at ubuntu.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas at canonical.com>
>> ---
>> Xi/xiallowev.c | 2 +-
>> dix/touch.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>> include/input.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Xi/xiallowev.c b/Xi/xiallowev.c
>> index a722c1d..c95dcc6 100644
>> --- a/Xi/xiallowev.c
>> +++ b/Xi/xiallowev.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ ProcXIAllowEvents(ClientPtr client)
>> case XIRejectTouch:
>> case XIAcceptTouch:
>> ret = AllowTouch(client, dev,
>> - stuff->mode, stuff->touchid,
>> + stuff->mode, stuff->touchid, stuff->grab_window,
>> &client->errorValue);
>> break;
>> default:
>> diff --git a/dix/touch.c b/dix/touch.c
>> index 6113371..e24d9ac 100644
>> --- a/dix/touch.c
>> +++ b/dix/touch.c
>> @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ TouchListenerGone(XID resource)
>>
>> int
>> AllowTouch(ClientPtr client, DeviceIntPtr dev, int mode, uint32_t touchid,
>> - XID *error)
>> + Window grab_window, XID *error)
>> {
>> TouchPointInfoPtr ti;
>> int nev, i;
>> @@ -1003,8 +1003,6 @@ AllowTouch(ClientPtr client, DeviceIntPtr dev, int mode, uint32_t touchid,
>> return BadDevice;
>> }
>>
>> - /* FIXME window is unhandled */
>> -
>> ti = TouchFindByClientID(dev, touchid);
>> if (!ti)
>> {
>> @@ -1012,9 +1010,17 @@ AllowTouch(ClientPtr client, DeviceIntPtr dev, int mode, uint32_t touchid,
>> return BadValue;
>> }
>>
>> - /* FIXME: Allow for early accept */
>> - if (ti->num_listeners == 0 ||
>> - CLIENT_ID(ti->listeners[0].listener) != client->index)
>> + for (i = 0; i < ti->num_listeners; i++)
>> + {
>> + if (CLIENT_ID(ti->listeners[i].listener) == client->index &&
>> + ti->listeners[i].window->drawable.id == grab_window)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + if (i < ti->num_listeners)
>> + return BadAccess;
>> +
>> + /* FIXME: Implement early accept/reject */
>> + if (i > 0)
>> return BadAccess;
>>
> I am not sure that i understand this.
> i<ti->num_listeners means the if was triggert
> i>0 is always true execpt on integer overflow
> did i miss something ?
>
> Would it be complicated to make that a function ?
I think it should be clearer in the second version I just sent out.
-- Chase
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list