[PATCH libXi] Use AM_CPPFLAGS to use in tree headers before installed headers

[Gaetan Nadon]

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 16:10 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:

> > Shouldn't XI_CFLAGS and MALLOC_ZERO_CFLAGS be in CPPFLAGS as well?
> 
> Assuming they're really pre-processor flags rather than compilation
> flags, yes... I admit I didn't dive into those since they were not
> part of the problem being fixed.
> 
> 

Any thing that comes from pkg-config might contain compiler flags, and
drivers certainly do with the visibility flag the server adds in there.
Whether the strict fix and flag reorg should be in the same patch is
different issue.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110920/4728623b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110920/4728623b/attachment.pgp>