[PATCH fonts-util 2/2] If cross-compiling, we don't have to run mkfontdir

Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Fri Sep 16 18:11:13 PDT 2011

On 09/16/11 06:04, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 16/09/2011 05:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> On 09/12/11 07:18, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>> +# -------------------
>>> +# Minimum version: 1.1.1
>> Shouldn't that be 1.3.0 since we already released 1.2.0?
> Good catch, thank you.
> I think I'd prefer to write 1.2.1, as the next version number will be at least
> that, unless we know that the next version number used is going to be 1.3.0?

Like xorg-macros, if we're adding a new macro, then the next version number
will be incrementing the second part of the version (1.x.0), since the macros
we use for checking minimum version only check the first two parts of the
version number tuple, using the convention that in major.minor.patch releases,
patches fix bugs, minors add new APIs, majors break compatibility.

	-Alan Coopersmith-        alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
	 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

More information about the xorg-devel mailing list