[PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

[Jeremy Huddleston]

Does this need ifdef based on some ABI version?

On Oct 30, 2011, at 22:49, Peter Hutterer wrote:

> Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may
> end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users
> and sis merged framebuffer users shows little overlap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> ---
> src/sis_driver.c |    2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/sis_driver.c b/src/sis_driver.c
> index 7ac9487..9f14cc7 100644
> --- a/src/sis_driver.c
> +++ b/src/sis_driver.c
> @@ -9347,7 +9347,7 @@ SISMergedPointerMoved(int scrnIndex, int x, int y)
>      if(doit) {
> 	UpdateCurrentTime();
> 	sigstate = xf86BlockSIGIO();
> -	miPointerAbsoluteCursor(x, y, currentTime.milliseconds);
> +	miPointerSetPosition(inputInfo.pointer, x, y);
> 	xf86UnblockSIGIO(sigstate);
> 	return;
>      }
> -- 
> 1.7.7
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>