[PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

[Peter Hutterer]

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20:15PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Does this need ifdef based on some ABI version?

yes, it does. several even, but until the two-screen-coordinates stuff is
merged I can't fix this since it'll change again then.

so ignore this patch for now pls.

Cheers,
  Peter
 
> On Oct 30, 2011, at 22:49, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> 
> > Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may
> > end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users
> > and sis merged framebuffer users shows little overlap.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> > ---
> > src/sis_driver.c |    2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/sis_driver.c b/src/sis_driver.c
> > index 7ac9487..9f14cc7 100644
> > --- a/src/sis_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/sis_driver.c
> > @@ -9347,7 +9347,7 @@ SISMergedPointerMoved(int scrnIndex, int x, int y)
> >      if(doit) {
> > 	UpdateCurrentTime();
> > 	sigstate = xf86BlockSIGIO();
> > -	miPointerAbsoluteCursor(x, y, currentTime.milliseconds);
> > +	miPointerSetPosition(inputInfo.pointer, x, y);
> > 	xf86UnblockSIGIO(sigstate);
> > 	return;
> >      }
> > -- 
> > 1.7.7
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
> > 
>