[PATCH 02/10] xfree86: NULL option values are technically valid, don't strdup them
walter harms
wharms at bfs.de
Mon Jul 4 10:29:15 PDT 2011
Am 04.07.2011 08:09, schrieb Peter Hutterer:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> ---
> hw/xfree86/common/xf86Option.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Option.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Option.c
> index 480f386..a3a836f 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Option.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Option.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ pointer
> xf86AddNewOption(pointer head, const char *name, const char *val)
> {
> /* XXX These should actually be allocated in the parser library. */
> - char *tmp = strdup(val);
> + char *tmp = val ? strdup(val) : NULL;
> char *tmp_name = strdup(name);
>
> return xf86addNewOption(head, tmp_name, tmp);
maybe "\0" is better here ? i have no clue what is done later with tmp_name
(possible nothing) but making a valid string pointer here removes the need for
things like: val ? strdup(val) : NULL;
re,
wh
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list