1.11 release process (was: [PULL] -next branch for 1.11)

Dave Airlie airlied at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 23:11:50 PST 2011


On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:55:13 +1000, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
>
>> There were a few times during the last cycle where patches didn't get merged
>> but for no apparent reason. A simple email to the list stating something
>> like "I'm unavailable for this week and won't be merging patches" would be
>> enough to know what's going on.
>
> Yeah, more communication is definitely better. I'm also trying to be
> pro-active when things seem ambiguous, not letting patches linger in an
> undefined state, but I do end up getting side-tracked by other
> activities on occasion. I'll let you know if I plan on getting pneumonia
> again too.

I'd rather you let us know when you have pneumonia ;-) or are sucked
into the Intel maw.

like if you have a laptop and can get an email out and have
outstanding merges for > 1 week, send a mail to xorg-devel.

Dave.


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list