[PATCH] randr: Add 'set' fields to SetCrtcConfigs request

[Alex Deucher]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:37:50 +0000, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
>
>> I'd be happiest with RandR 1.4 backed out until 1.11.  I just don't
>> think it's had quite enough (non-rushed) review, exposure or testing,
>> and it's not the best of precedents to be setting for future releases.
>> Sorry.
>
> As release manager, this seems like the right solution. However, it's a
> larger change than adding the new fix-ups, which doesn't exactly make me
> less nervous.
>
> In either case, I need to see some testing of the server before I feel
> comfortable releasing it.
>
> Can I get people to run the backout-randr branch today so we can get
> some idea of whether we had accidental dependencies on the randr 1.4
> code in drivers or other parts of the server?

We have this commit in the most recent radeon release:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=3dc28c86eb57cac819e4ed650acfe1f7df6ef565
Which will conflict with the backout.

Alex

>
> The branch without RandR 1.4:
>
>        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver backout-randr
>
> If you want to try out the RandR 1.4 bits, you can use:
>
>        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver randr-fixes
>
> To test the RandR 1.4 bits, you'll need:
>
>        git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/randrproto master
>
>        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/libXrandr randr-1.4
>
>        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xrandr randr-1.4
>
> Please report success or failure from any testing.
>
> --
> keith.packard at intel.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>