[Patch] refactor pointer acceleration

[Oldřich Jedlička]

Hi Simon,

On Sunday 06 February 2011 14:15:55 Simon Thum wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 10:18 AM, walter harms wrote:
> > hi Simon,
> > thx for you effort, just one thing:
> > you will get more feedback when you send the patches one by one
> > in the body and not as attachment.
> 
> Well, I admit sticking to the workflow easiest for me, since my mailer
> just inlines text attachments so it doesn't impair me when others do
> that. I'll see if I can make Thunderbird and git friends somehow.

I used Git several times on other projects to send mails (patches, patch 
series) to mailing lists directly. It just needs to configure the Git mailer 
for that. I used `git format-patch` to prepare patch series into a separate 
directory (don't remember exact parameters) and `git send-emails` to send the 
patches from that directory to target mailing list.

Cheers,
Oldřich.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Simon
> 
> > re,
> > 
> >  wh
> > 
> > Am 05.02.2011 22:39, schrieb Simon Thum:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >> 
> >> the patch series consists mainly of refactoring, no functional changes.
> >> The main point is to separate property handling from the acceleration
> >> structure and to make use of the ValuatorMask struct now in place.
> >> 
> >> They work on my machine, any I don't think much further testing is
> >> required.
> >> 
> >> And one more thing: The some code in AddInputDevice seems bogus to me,
> >> but I don't have the HW to test it. The transform matrix gets set as a
> >> input property before the handler is registered. Thus if I'm right,
> >> dev->transform never gets initialized as long as no-one updates the
> >> property. Simply moving the handler registration upwards should fix it.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel