patch: libXt-1.0.8 fix possible array overflow
walter harms
wharms at bfs.de
Thu Sep 23 09:26:47 PDT 2010
Barry Scott schrieb:
> On Wednesday 22 September 2010 08:18:21 walter harms wrote:
>> hi List,
>> the code checks the upperlimit to 10 while the upperlimit is actualy 9.
>
> You could use "(sizeof( par )/sizeof( String ))-1" to make the code robust aginst
> a change to the size of par.
>
yep, i could use XtNumber(), personally i prefer
i%=10;
par=Xtmalloc(i*sizeof(String));
but i wanted to fix the overflow first.
the point i to not understand what do they copy the pointer at all ?
they could yjust do the fprintf() and ready ..
re,
wh
and change to printf below into a loop
> Barry
>
>> re,
>> wh
>>
>>
>> --- libXt-1.0.8/src/Error.c.org 2010-09-21 23:23:00.000000000 +0200
>> +++ libXt-1.0.8/src/Error.c 2010-09-21 23:24:03.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
>> */
>> Cardinal i = *num_params;
>> String par[10];
>> - if (i > 10) i = 10;
>> + if (i > 9) i = 9;
>> (void) memmove((char*)par, (char*)params, i * sizeof(String) );
>> bzero( &par[i], (10-i) * sizeof(String) );
>> (void) fprintf (stderr, "%s%s",
>> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
>> */
>> Cardinal i = *num_params;
>> String par[10];
>> - if (i > 10) i = 10;
>> + if (i > 9) i = 9;
>> (void) memmove((char*)par, (char*)params, i * sizeof(String) );
>> bzero( &par[i], (10-i) * sizeof(String) );
>> if (i != *num_params)
>> _______________________________________________
>> xorg at lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
>> Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
>> Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
>> Your subscription address: barry.scott at onelan.co.uk
>>
>>
>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list