[PATCH xserver] xfree86 linux: Don't complain about setsid failures.

[Daniel Stone]

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:29:24 -0700
> > From: Jesse Adkins <jesserayadkins at gmail.com>
> > 
> > setsid only fails with EPERM, and it only fails if we're already
> > the process leader (which is what would happen if it succeeded).
> > 
> > Patch attached to prevent tab damage
> 
> If you do, please make sure your MUA doesn't encode these as base64.
> Difficult to review a diff like the one below:

I honestly have no idea which MUA you're using in 2010 that can't
comprehend MIME/base64.  mailx?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100920/3fe12b76/attachment.pgp>