[PATCH] mouse wheel acceleration

[Simon Thum]

Am 09.09.2010 00:41, schrieb Albert Zeyer:
>  Simon Thum:
>>> 2. The pointer acceleration code was highly pointer specific. It heavily
>>> used those valuators.
>> Yes again - but only in the scheme function. That's just wiring it up
>> with the pointer - as said, the acceleration context is pretty agnostic
>> (I'm cooking up a patch to get rid of the last field ATM)
> Can you leave me a message when you have cleaned that up? I'll try to
> rewrite my patch then.
I'm attaching the patches in my queue. They're not tested yet, but look
fine to me. (The first one is actually tested and your queue Peter,
please ignore the others for now)

The cleanup is simply I shifted init fully into ptrveloc.c and could
remove some header stuff and move the prop_handlers into the scheme data
directly.

It won't affect you much, I more or less wanted to prove that accel
isn't tied to pointers or valuators.

> 
>>> When will pscroll be adopted? Or will it? When/how is such a decision
>>> made? Will it be soon? If not, what are the problems with pscroll? If
>> Mostly technical problems AFAIK - it doesn't apply to master and it
>> seems to collect dust (I may be wrong ITR).
> Can anyone else comment on this? The applying itself shouldn't really be
> a problem.
I'm CC'ing Peter to increase the chance he'll enlighten us.
(http://github.com/x-quadraht/pscroll)

Cheers,

Simon
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-fix-xf86-backend-specific-input-initialization.patch
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100909/8ed67ae1/attachment.ksh>