[PATCH 2/3] ddx: Prepare xf86 to renounce input handling duties
Fernando Carrijo
fcarrijo.lists at gmail.com
Wed Sep 8 00:32:09 PDT 2010
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:00:13PM -0300, Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> > From: Fernando Carrijo <fcarrijo at freedesktop.org>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Carrijo <fcarrijo at freedesktop.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti at nokia.com>
>
> I think I'd prefer to see these three patches squashed together.
> Patches don't always have to be strictly divided by subsystems and
> introducing a struct in one patch to remove it in the next one from another
> part is a bit confusing. Better to just move the struct in one go, that way
> the diff shows that it has moved.
Okay.
> In the case of these patches, the only real new parts seem to be the
> makefile and includes, everything else is more-or-less cut/paste.
Right.
> Also, please add to the commit message _why_ you're doing this. You
> referenced http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-August/012204.html
> in your header email but I can't find any argument for moving input handling
> from the DDX to the DIX in there.
I'll strive to find the balance between what you guys consider under- and
over-documenting. In advance, the changes brought in this series regard only
the modularization of common functionality in order to avoid code duplication.
> A quick peek at the kdrive source seems that kdrive has similar input
> handling facilities. It's likely that the other DDXs have them too so I need
> to ask you to provide the follow-up patches to the other DDXs as well.
> Otherwise, the move to the DIX seems a bit pointless.
I will provide them.
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list