[PATCH 16/19] xfree86: remove {Dont}SendCoreEvents defines

Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) tiago.vignatti at nokia.com
Tue Sep 7 05:15:00 PDT 2010


Hi,

On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:06:22PM +0200, ext Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't think anybody said that, and there are plenty of
> counter-examples.  Where did you get that quote?

refer below, Julien.


On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:03:59AM +0200, ext Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:52:25PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > 
> > I think I'm fine for this kind of changes, but I had tried the same argument
> > with video drivers and people claimed that "new servers should be compatible
> > with old drivers".
> 
> could you be confusing this with the protocol header files?
>
> We have some backwards compatibility from the (input) drivers and they all
> work with multiple X server versions. But afaik we never bothered about
> backwards compat from the server unless the ABI was already frozen.

yeah, I was wrong in my initial comment. Discard it please.

I inverted and confused the logic which should be "multiple servers' versions
compatible with new drivers". That's how I see happening the development right
now - I remembering some time ago when someone attempt to remove libpciaccess
or ISA bus support in driver side that doesn't exist anymore in new servers
but still in driver side. 

In my opinion I like 1:1 mapping (drivers merged with server), which I think
accelerates development. But, anyway, this is going off topic and is subject
for XDS on next week :)


Cheers,
             Tiago


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list