[PATCH 3/3] xfree86: Add a conservative SIGIO handler path
Adam Jackson
ajax at redhat.com
Tue Oct 19 12:41:20 PDT 2010
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:26 -0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:49:06PM +0200, ext Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Instead of actually processing input in the handler, the conservative
> > path just raises enough of a dispatch exception to bomb out of request
> > processing and handle input instead.
>
> ajax, I understand the rationale but would be great if you elaborate a bit
> defending why we need _another_ method here. We're adding more complexity and,
> for instance, we would have to justify the removal of this new method when
> introducing the input-thread given I was already assuming like dead all SIGIO
> paths.
>
> So, to better accomplish this all, we need to perform and benchmark:
> 1. input thread
> 2. aggressive SIGIO (current one by default on linux)
> 3. conservative SIGIO (raising up isItTimeToYield)
> 4. old input processing using the main thread handler
>
> Do you have some thoughts on those?
Actually, what I want to see is:
1: input threads if you have working threads
2: classic-ish input processing if you don't, with something like the
conservative SIGIO handler as a helper if your platform has SIGIO
support
Which should be a material improvement for everybody, even if it doesn't
reduce the number of code paths it's at least no more complex than what
we have.
- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20101019/5d729e57/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list