[PATCH] dix: optimize CallCallbacks

[Adam Jackson]

On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:35 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:

> I once tried to clean up all the inline, __inline, __inline__, _X_INLINE
> declarations but never actually got an answer which one I should use.
> The documentation says that inline is an optional extension and that one
> should use _X_INLINE. But too much code already assumes that the
> compiler supports inline. Is everyone fine with that?

They'd better be.  AC_C_INLINE should have been handling this for us at
any rate.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20101012/51ed47b0/attachment.pgp>