[RFC XI 2.1 - inputproto] Add touch classes and events, bump to 2.1

[Chase Douglas]

On 11/17/2010 01:25 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:35:01PM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> diff --git a/XI2.h b/XI2.h
>> index 6ba1377..f3ee7f0 100644
>> --- a/XI2.h
>> +++ b/XI2.h
>> @@ -32,10 +32,12 @@
>>  #define Dont_Check                              0
>>  #endif
>>  #define XInput_2_0                              7
>> +#define XInput_2_1                              8
> 
> coincidentally, that's a libXi-internal define that should be removed from
> the protocol headers. I've got the patch ready for this, leave this one
> as-is for now.

Ok.

>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  AC_PREREQ([2.60])
>> -AC_INIT([InputProto], [2.0], [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg])
>> +AC_INIT([InputProto], [2.1], [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg])
> 
> bump to version 2.0.99.1 is better for now, we can't possibly claim this is
> stable yet :)

Good point!

>>  AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign dist-bzip2])
>>  AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
> 
> I would _really_ like to see the XI2proto.txt patch for this too to see the
> semantics of these changes.

Ok, I applied the big diff of the XI2proto.txt from your multitouch tree
and modified it where appropriate. I deleted all references to grabbing
and did not add any new grab-like semantics at this time.

> Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> for this patch, but that's without knowing wider implications based on the
> semantics.

I've not added your tag since I added the XI2proto.txt changes. Please
review again to be sure everything seems good. I'm going to assume that
a Reviewed-by tag from you and Daniel is a mark of consensus agreement
on the protocol changes laid out in the commit.

I pushed the changes to my repo on fdo, and I'll send a new patch so we
can do further inline review.

Thanks,

-- Chase