[PATCH 07/16] dmx: __glXMalloc -> malloc, etc.

[Alex Deucher]

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Jamey Sharp <jamey at minilop.net> wrote:
> Hi Alex! Thanks for reviewing!
>
> I can't merge this commit without the one before it, "Delete unused
> GLX visual matching code." That code calls both the __glX*alloc
> functions and the X*alloc ones, and I don't want to review it to see
> whether it was relying on __glXMalloc to return NULL when passed a
> size of 0. I wasn't so concerned about doing that review for this
> patch when I found that the reference implementation of GLX already
> made this change, but the reference implementation's visuals code was
> gone by then.
>
> Could you (or somebody else) maybe review the "Delete unused GLX
> visual matching code" patch too?
>

I'm not too familiar with the glx code, but since this has already
been removed from the server, I guess it should be safe to get rid of
here as well.  Does glxproxy even work?

Alex

> Thanks,
> Jamey
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jamey Sharp <jamey at minilop.net> wrote:
>>> Kristian made equivalent edits to the reference GLX implementation in
>>> 2006, with commit 2d2d38d17cc2558f8a41166a4a1578bc4c663c37.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
>