[PATCH xserver] config: declare xserver private dependencies in xorg-server.pc

[Gaetan Nadon]

On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 07:01 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:54:38 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/xorg-server.pc.in b/xorg-server.pc.in
> >> index 44f886a..898bed2 100644
> >> --- a/xorg-server.pc.in
> >> +++ b/xorg-server.pc.in
> >> @@ -16,5 +16,6 @@ Name: xorg-server
> >>  Description: Modular X.Org X Server
> >>  Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
> >>  Requires: pixman-1 pciaccess xproto >= 7.0.17
> >> +Requires.private: @REQUIRED_MODULES@
> >>  Cflags: -I${sdkdir} @symbol_visibility@
> >>  Libs: -L${libdir}
> >
> > Is all the stuff in REQUIRED_MODULES actually exposed by sdk
> > headers?  AFAICT it's randr, xext, render, input, xkb and xv protos.
> 
> Yeah, I'd agree.
> 
> Gaeton, maybe you can make a new variable called PC_REQUIRED_MODULES
> or something? This would represent required modules exposed in the
> pkg-config file. For the optional ones, you'd have something like
> this:
> 
> if test "x$XV" = xyes; then
>         REQUIRED_MODULES="$REQUIRED_MODULES $VIDEOPROTO"
>         PC_REQUIRED_MODULES="$PC_REQUIRED_MODULES $VIDEOPROTO"
> ...
> 

Sure, will repost. Is the list of sdk exposed modules complete? Is there
a mechanical way to find out?

Thanks


> --
> Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100610/6ff5e668/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100610/6ff5e668/attachment.pgp>