[PATCH 08/14] xfree86: delete useless "Primary device is not PCI" message

Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki) tiago.vignatti at nokia.com
Tue Jun 1 11:07:23 PDT 2010


On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 06:29:28PM +0200, ext Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> On 6/1/10 4:59 PM, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > It's not PCI? So what?!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti<tiago.vignatti at nokia.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c |    6 ------
> >   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c
> > index a751427..b64bae3 100644
> > --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c
> > +++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c
> > @@ -1318,14 +1318,8 @@ xf86PciMatchDriver(char* matches[], int nmatches) {
> >       }
> >
> >       pci_iterator_destroy(iter);
> > -
> > -    if (!info) {
> > -	ErrorF("Primary device is not PCI\n");
> > -    }
> >   #ifdef __linux__
> > -    else {
> >   	matchDriverFromFiles(matches, info->vendor_id, info->device_id);
> 
> How much do Xorg developers care about indentation? This should be at 
> the same level as pci_iterator_destroy() a couple lines above.

How much do Xorg reviewers care about the logic and the correct behaviour of
the code without caring about tiny details like indentation? 

Yeah, besides the indentation, the hunk itself was wrong.
 
             Tiago


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list