[PATCH] int10: Remove the vm86 and stub backends
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Fri Jul 30 02:20:26 PDT 2010
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:53:39 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:35 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Coopersmith
> > <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com> wrote:
> > > Isn't vm86 even further limited to just those machines running the Linux
> > > kernel, not BSD or Solaris or anything else? (Okay, maybe that doesn't
> > > take a huge chunk out of the number of machines that can run it, but it
> > > is replacing one more platform-specific difference with common code.)
>
> I could have sworn one of the BSDs had implemented a vm86 syscall, but I
> can't find any reference to it now. It certainly doesn't seem to exist
> under Solaris.
FreeBSD had one. Trying to use it was a huge disaster, emulation was
totally the way to go.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100730/88011c54/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list