xorg-server-1.8.99.904 tag

Peter Harris pharris at opentext.com
Tue Jul 13 11:03:58 PDT 2010


On 2010-07-13 12:24, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> 
> 0001 corresponds to commit 1884db430a5680e37e94726dff46686e2218d525 
>
>  and doesn't apply to the clean 1.8.99.904 tarball:

It looks like Peter and Keith both independently picked up that patch.
Keith's 018c878e is part of the tag, but Peter's wasn't merged until
69b2b5c "Merge remote branch 'whot/for-keith'.

> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
> Apply anyway? [n]
> 
> Was the tag applied to the wrong commit, or am I missing something
> here?

Just that the patch really was previously applied, since it's in git
twice (once before the tag, and once after).

git-format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream looks like it ought to help,
but it only appears to work if the two end-points haven't already been
merged. Hmm.

Peter Harris
-- 
               Open Text Connectivity Solutions Group
Peter Harris                    http://connectivity.opentext.com/
Research and Development        Phone: +1 905 762 6001
pharris at opentext.com            Toll Free: 1 877 359 4866


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list