[PATCH] list: fix list macro to not require variables named next.

[Dave Airlie]

From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>

If you didn't call the temp variable for the macro, next, it wouldn't
actually work.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
---
 include/list.h |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/list.h b/include/list.h
index 89dc29d..f80adb0 100644
--- a/include/list.h
+++ b/include/list.h
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ list_is_empty(struct list *head)
 	 &pos->member != (head);					\
 	 pos = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member))
 
-#define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, head, member)		\
+#define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, storage, head, member)		\
     for (pos = __container_of((head)->next, pos, member),		\
-	 next = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member);		\
+	 storage = __container_of(pos->member.next, pos, member);	\
 	 &pos->member != (head);					\
-	 pos = next, next = __container_of(next->member.next, next, member))
+	 pos = storage, storage = __container_of(storage->member.next, storage, member))
 
 #endif
-- 
1.7.1