[PATCH libX11 1/2] Fix warnings for recent bigreqsproto, xcmiscproto, and xf86bigfontproto

[Jeremy Huddleston]

I think it makes sense because:

1) If people are updating their libX11, they can easily update their protos.
2) We're reporting that they're deprecated, so if we expect 3rd party clients of the headers to migrate, we should be willing to do it for our own code.
3) The server has already done it.
4) Fewer warnings make me happier, and I like being happy.

On Feb 3, 2010, at 09:14, Julien Cristau wrote:

> 
> Would it make sense to keep compatibility with the old header locations
> instead of requiring the newer protos?
> 
> I don't have a particular opinion either way, just thought I'd ask.
> 
> Cheers,
> Julien