[PATCH libX11 1/2] Fix warnings for recent bigreqsproto, xcmiscproto, and xf86bigfontproto
Dan Nicholson
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 08:56:58 PST 2010
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jeremy Huddleston
<jeremyhu at freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 19:49, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
>>> - X11_REQUIRES="${X11_REQUIRES} xau xcmiscproto bigreqsproto"
>>> + X11_REQUIRES="${X11_REQUIRES} xau [xcmiscproto >= 1.2.0] [bigreqsproto >= 1.1.0]"
>>
>> Do these actually change anything? autoconf is just going to remove
>> the [] after processing through m4, and having >= within quotes in
>> shell is fine. There's a lot of this excessive quoting/unquoting in
>> the x configure.ac's, and all that's really needed is to make sure
>> that the arguments to the autoconf m4 macros are quoted...
>
> I did it more for stylistic reasons.
Fair enough. I doesn't hurt anything.
>>> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES(BIGFONT, xf86bigfontproto,
>>> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(BIGFONT, [xf86bigfontproto >= 1.2.0],
>>
>> like this. Can you show the warning that was being printed?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean... I thought it was fairly obvious from the commit message.
>
> $ echo "#include <X11/extensions/xf86bigfstr.h>" | gcc -E - -o /dev/null
> In file included from <stdin>:1:
> ./xf86bigfstr.h:1:2: warning: #warning "xf86bigfstr.h is obsolete and may be removed in the future."
> ./xf86bigfstr.h:2:2: warning: #warning "include <X11/extensions/xf86bigfproto.h> for the protocol defines."
Sorry, I thought you meant there were warnings from autoconf, too.
This obviously makes more sense.
Acked-by: Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list