[PATCH] RandR version 1.4 additions

[Keith Packard]

On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:02:28 +0000, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:

> Or, rather than listing the exact semantics, just state that the
> configuration may be changed to attempt to make the CRTC visible in an
> implementation-defined manner.

Yeah, could do that as well. Given our lack of experience doing any of
this, perhaps a bit of maneuvering room would be best.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20101207/ec0577a3/attachment.pgp>