[PATCH libXi] fix build with gcc 2.95

[Daniel Stone]

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:37:57AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:53:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> > Looks like a sufficiently trivial change, but what system still using
> > gcc 2.95 does anyone care about running modern X.Org on?
> 
> I have to repeat this every time I send a patch for gcc 2.95... :) 

In fairness, it is rather unintuitive that an allegedly supported
OS/architecture combination must have the absolute newest X server, yet
hasn't managed to update its compiler in just over 11 years[0].

Cheers,
Daniel

[0]: 9 years, if you're being kind and counting 2.95.3.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100827/f37e8117/attachment.pgp>