RFD: setting up a minimal xorg configuration
Daniel Stone
daniel at fooishbar.org
Wed Apr 14 20:23:56 PDT 2010
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:57:37PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:15:07PM +0200, ext Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Do you have hard numbers on what it's actually saving, particularly as
> > to whether it affects the number of pages that actually get accessed
> > rather than the on-disk size?
>
> Pick the linux kernel. Compile with all modules. Modules builtin. Okay, it's
> cooked. Use for all kind of devices. There we have the exactly the current
> Xorg without these options.
>
> For me seems so obvious to conditionalize code that I don't use. I understand
> that we'll be introducing complexity here, but it's must. IMHO the only thing
> to discuss is _how_ we should do it, trying to minimize such complexity.
>
> Or Am I missing something very hardly obvious?
Hi,
So ajax is pretty much dead on the money, but the other thing here is
the scale:
daniels at tempa:~/src/linux-2.6(cfb2bb9...)% wc -l **/*.[ch] | tail -1
11114827 total
daniels at tempa:~/x/xorg/xserver(master*)% wc -l **/*.[ch] | tail -1
569393 total
Not to mention that we already cut out all the drivers, so the remains
are only core code.
Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100415/1c757895/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list