Merged proto package

Keith Packard keithp at keithp.com
Thu Apr 8 10:17:37 PDT 2010


On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:12:39 -0700, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 02:33:22 -0500, "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> >
> >> 6) Please tell me you're not planning on releasing this package with the
> >> name "proto". :-)
> >
> > Oh. Yeah, probably not the best name. 'xproto'? 'xprotocol'?
> 
> Well, considering we already have 'xproto' as one of the individual
> modules, it might make sense to go with 'xorg-proto'. That would be
> nicely synced with 'xorg-server'.

Eric came up with an obvious solution here. We simply take over the
existing 'xproto' package and start with that existing version
number. It's not tied to any protocol visible number at all.

I'll plan on bumping that to '7.1.0'. Seem reasonable?

Then we switch the X server to depending only on that package with that
version number. We can still install the other .pc files for backwards
compatibility, but future changes would want to use only the xproto
version number.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100408/0cb2c432/attachment.pgp>


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list