No subject

graphics drivers was aimed for 1.10 instead of 1.9. Is there any reason 
for rushing this?

This means that merging graphics drivers back into the server needs to 
be discussed in full, instead of just being decided ad-hoc by those who 
were at XDC. Please list and explain the advantages that this will bring 
over modular drivers, a tinderbox, and patch review.

Why are you pushing towards a 3 month release cycle? I can only assume 
that this is because the intel portland team has been doing quarterly 
release cycles on their intel driver.

Lumping the proto headers together seems like the first step on a 
complete undo of modularization on the non-driver side as well. Are we 
now backpedalling completely on the big first really big statement X.org 
made?

How does this look technically? Are we not going to get into a libdrm 
like situation, where an update of one volatile part forces a version 
bump of the amalgamut, which in turn forces updates of all the 
dependants, even when they just depend on some otherwise stable parts? 
Are we then not just plainly scurrying towards having the protoheaders, 
the libraries, the library headers and the server all back in one 
repository?

Thanks.

Luc Verhaegen.

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/xorg-devel@lists.x.org/msg02128.html
[2] http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2003-March/000128.html