New development model check-in.

[Michel Dänzer]

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 20:58 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 23:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: 
> > > So, this is just a quick status check on the new development
> > > model. I'd like to hear from anyone with an opinion on how it's
> > > working for them.
> > > 
> > > Obviously we're seeing a bit more delay in getting patches into
> > > master, but I think that's been mostly positive, with a bit more
> > > discussion happening on various patch sets about the best way to do
> > > things.
> > > 
> > > Am I providing enough feedback about patches that aren't immediately
> > > applied? Do people want more comments on patches which are applied?
> > > Has anyone had a patch go missing (neither applied nor replied to)? Am
> > > I messing up in some other way?
> > 
> > It's not working too well for EXA yet; a number of acked patches haven't
> > been applied yet.
> 
> I'd suggest creating your own tree and sending pull requests, rather
> than relying on random patchsets on the list being vaccuumed up ...

Are there at least any indications that we're getting any tangible
benefits from this increased workload?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer