[ANNOUNCE] udlfb 0.2.2 and xf86-driver-displaylink 0.2

[Adam Jackson]

On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 23:47 +0200, Roberto De Ioris wrote:

> > The static mode list is... what's the polite word here... unpleasant.
> >
> > I'm also a bit confused that the setup data used for all the static
> > modes doesn't appear to be linearly related to the mode timings.  This
> > seems needlessly opaque.
> 
> Without proper specs (from displaylink) it is impossibile to set the modes
> without using those horrible blobs.

I wasn't blaming _you_.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20090610/c5284ba0/attachment.pgp