On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:52 +0100, Christian König wrote: > > > You could try to replace the "for (order = min(MAX_ORDER - 1UL, > __fls(num_pages)); num_pages;" in ttm_pool_alloc() with "for (order = 0; > num_pages;" to get the old behavior. That's a nogo too. -Mike