[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] ac/nir: set lod to 0 for ac_image_load_mip
Samuel Pitoiset
samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com
Fri Apr 27 08:05:00 UTC 2018
On 04/26/2018 01:51 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Is there any reason why we can't just use ac_image_load in such cases?
For nit_texop_txf_ms we need one more coordinate for the sample index,
if we use ac_image_load we only loads 2 coordinates instead of 4 with
ac_image_load_mip. Though, I have to admit that I'm a bit confused.
Any thoughts on this?
>
> On 26.04.2018 13:18, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>> Otherwise we hit an assertion in ac_build_image_opcode()
>> for ac_image_load_mip.
>>
>> v2: - set only for ac_image_load_mip
>>
>> Fixes: 24fb3e6aa16 ("ac/nir: use ac_build_image_opcode for image
>> intrinsics")
>> Cc: 18.1 <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> index e4ae6ef49ad..fb8e44509e9 100644
>> --- a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> @@ -1276,6 +1276,8 @@ static LLVMValueRef build_tex_intrinsic(struct
>> ac_nir_context *ctx,
>> args->opcode = args->level_zero ||
>> instr->sampler_dim == GLSL_SAMPLER_DIM_MS ?
>> ac_image_load : ac_image_load_mip;
>> + if (args->opcode == ac_image_load_mip && !args->lod)
>> + args->lod = ctx->ac.i32_0;
>> args->level_zero = false;
>> break;
>> case nir_texop_txs:
>>
>
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list