[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if it's non-zero
Nanley Chery
nanleychery at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 22:07:14 UTC 2018
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:18:54AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message
> rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very
> nice clean-up.
>
To make sure we're on the same page, I made an error in using the term
clear address, because the code only checks part of it (the bo)?
What do you think of this new commit message?
i965/wm_surface_state: Use the clear address if clear_bo is non-NULL
We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by
returning zero for the clear color bo and offset.
v2: Fix usage of "clear address" in commit message (Jason).
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
>
Thanks!
-Nanley
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Nanley Chery <nanleychery at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by
> > returning zero for the clear address.
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c
> > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c
> > index 06f739faf61..3c70dbcc110 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c
> > @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
> > struct brw_bo *aux_bo = NULL;
> > struct isl_surf *aux_surf = NULL;
> > uint64_t aux_offset = 0;
> > + struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL;
> > + uint32_t clear_offset = 0;
> > struct intel_miptree_aux_buffer *aux_buf =
> > intel_miptree_get_aux_buffer(mt);
> >
> > if (aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) {
> > @@ -165,6 +167,8 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
> > /* We only really need a clear color if we also have an auxiliary
> > * surface. Without one, it does nothing.
> > */
> > + clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo;
> > + clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset;
> > clear_color = mt->fast_clear_color;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -173,15 +177,6 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
> > brw->isl_dev.ss.align,
> > surf_offset);
> >
> > - bool use_clear_address = devinfo->gen >= 10 && aux_surf;
> > -
> > - struct brw_bo *clear_bo = NULL;
> > - uint32_t clear_offset = 0;
> > - if (use_clear_address) {
> > - clear_bo = aux_buf->clear_color_bo;
> > - clear_offset = aux_buf->clear_color_offset;
> > - }
> > -
> > isl_surf_fill_state(&brw->isl_dev, state, .surf = &surf, .view =
> > &view,
> > .address = brw_state_reloc(&brw->batch,
> > *surf_offset +
> > brw->isl_dev.ss.addr_offset,
> > @@ -190,7 +185,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
> > .aux_address = aux_offset,
> > .mocs = brw_get_bo_mocs(devinfo, mt->bo),
> > .clear_color = clear_color,
> > - .use_clear_address = use_clear_address,
> > + .use_clear_address = clear_bo != NULL,
> > .clear_address = clear_offset,
> > .x_offset_sa = tile_x, .y_offset_sa = tile_y);
> > if (aux_surf) {
> > @@ -222,7 +217,7 @@ brw_emit_surface_state(struct brw_context *brw,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (use_clear_address) {
> > + if (clear_bo != NULL) {
> > /* Make sure the offset is aligned with a cacheline. */
> > assert((clear_offset & 0x3f) == 0);
> > uint32_t *clear_address =
> > --
> > 2.16.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> >
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list